西西里的美丽传说

China rejects US-led statement on missile test notification, warns against ‘political manipulation’_我的网站

A |     

    This photo taken on July 6, 2026 shows the moment of a strategic missile launched by a strategic nuclear submarine of the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) Navy bursting out of the water surface. Photo: Li Xiangchao
China on Wednesday slammed a US-led joint statement regarding China's notification of a ballistic missile launch, calling the move as being driven solely by political motives and exposing the hypocrisy and double standards of the US and certain countries.
"The so-called joint statement by the US and relevant countries at the Conference on Disarmament, which brandished the Hague Code of Conduct Against Ballistic Missile Proliferation and alluded to China's missile test launch, was driven solely by political motives and fully reveals their hypocrisy and double standards," Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Guo Jiakun said on Wednesday. 
China urges relevant countries to stop abusing multilateral arms control mechanisms, replace irrational confrontation with sincere dialogue and create conditions necessary for enhancing dialogue and exchanges in the area of arms control, Guo said. 
The comments came after China's Ambassador for Disarmament Affairs Li Chijiang firmly rejected the US-led joint statement at a UN meeting in Geneva on Tuesday local time, stressing that China's legitimate defense modernization should not be called into question, and its goodwill in providing advance notification of missile launch should not be hijacked by geopolitical calculations.  
    China's Ambassador for Disarmament Affairs Li Chijiang rejects a US-led joint statement concerning China's ballistic missile launch notifications at the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva on August 11, 2026. Photo: Screenshot from CMG
At a plenary meeting of the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva on Tuesday, the US and other 40 countries issued a joint statement on what they called "notifications of ballistic missile launches," criticizing China's submarine-launched intercontinental ballistic missile test conducted in July. 
In response, Li Chijiang called the move political manipulation and blatant double standards and said China firmly opposes the abuse of the Conference on Disarmament for political maneuvering.
Driven by its own political interests, the US had rallied a number of countries, including some that are not members of the conference, to join the statement and had nitpicked and leveled baseless accusations against China's goodwill gesture of providing advance notification of the missile test, he said.
He noted that the US criticism was groundless, saying Washington had cited the voluntary political commitment of the Hague Code of Conduct Against Ballistic Missile Proliferation (HCOC) to demand that China provide advance notifications of missile launches. However, China is not a member of the HCOC and is therefore not bound by its provisions.
The Chinese People's Liberation Army Navy announced on July 6 that one strategic nuclear submarine of the navy successfully launched a strategic missile carrying a dummy warhead toward relevant high seas of the Pacific Ocean at 12:01 pm, which landed precisely within the designated waters. 
China notified relevant countries in advance of the test launch of a nuclear submarine-based strategic missile, demonstrating the openness and transparency of the Chinese armed forces, said Chen Xi, a spokesperson for the Ministry of National Defense, at a press conference in July.
The US led statement at the Geneva disarmament conference seeks to inject geopolitical rivalry into a multilateral arms control platform. Rather than advancing genuine disarmament, Washington is seeking to stigmatize China as a security threat, constrain its legitimate defense related development and strategic deterrence capabilities, rally an anti China bloc and reinforce US led hegemony, Zhang Junshe, a Chinese military affairs expert, told the Global Times. 
The US had repeatedly hyped China's July test launch. Previously on July 8, an official from the US Department of State criticized China's missile test launch, claiming that China notified the US too late and didn't give sufficient detail.
In response, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said at a press conference that China has stressed more than once that the test launch complies with international law and customary international practice and is not directed at any specific country or target. The Chinese side has released relevant information in a timely manner and notified the US and other countries beforehand.
Distracting attention 
The US-led group doesn't represent the international community. Its accusations over China's missile tests lack both reason and legitimacy, reflecting prejudice, hegemonic thinking and an attempt to constrain China's development, said a Beijing-based scholar of China-US relations. 
By rallying the other 40 countries to pressure China, the US has once again exposed its familiar playbook of double standards, bloc-building and confrontation. More broadly, Washington's China policy increasingly reflects strategic anxiety and a lack of confidence - not only in governance, the economy, and technology, but also in the military domain, said the expert.
According to the list of 40 other countries published by the US State Department, the signatories include US allies in Europe and Asia. The statement also called on all countries, particularly nuclear-weapon states that launch intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), and space launch vehicles (SLVs), to provide notification at least 24 hours in advance. "Such notifications should include information such as the general class of the ballistic missile or SLV, the planned launch notification window, the launch area and the intended direction of flight."
Zhang Jiadong, professor at the Center for American Studies, Fudan University, said by demanding at least 24 hours' advance notice and detailed launch information, the US wants to gain greater visibility into China's strategic nuclear capabilities by securing earlier and more specific data on missile tests. 
By hyping transparency and notification requirements, Washington is seeking to pressure China into revealing more about its military capabilities, reflecting growing anxiety over China's capability, even as questions remain over Washington's own transparency regarding missile tests and nuclear deterrence, said Zhang Jiadong.
Military affairs expert Zhang Junshe also noted that the US has intensified its criticism of China to deflect attention from its own expansion of extended deterrence, nuclear-sharing arrangements and missile-defense programs. These moves heighten the risk of nuclear confrontation, while Washington appears to believe that accusing other countries of lacking transparency can help justify its own military buildup and destabilizing policies.
Moreover, the US possesses one of the world's largest nuclear arsenals and conducts frequent ICBM tests. Against that backdrop, it is absurd for Washington to criticize China, which keeps nuclear capabilities at the minimum level required for national security, said Zhang. 
For example, in a single test event last year, the US Navy conducted four scheduled test launches of unarmed Trident II D5LE submarine-launched ballistic missiles from an Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine off Florida between September 17 and 21, 2025. The launches brought the Trident II D5 strategic weapon system to 197 successful flight tests, according to the US Navy.
At the UN meeting in Geneva on Tuesday, China's Ambassador for Disarmament Affairs Li Chijiang also noted that the US was in no position to criticize China over missile testing. China has conducted only three intercontinental ballistic missile tests to date, the fewest among the five nuclear-weapon states, while the US has carried out more such tests, and more frequently, than any other country, he said.
The US has itself failed to properly fulfill responsibilities regarding missile-test notifications and therefore has no grounds to criticize China's voluntary advance notification, Li added.
Li stressed that China remains committed to peaceful development and follows a self-defensive nuclear strategy. China keeps its nuclear forces at the minimum level required for national security and does not participate in any form of nuclear arms race, he said.
China's nuclear forces are an indispensable part of efforts to deter nuclear war, safeguard world peace and security, and maintain global strategic stability. "How can the US, a prolific missile tester and relentless arms expander, fault China for voluntarily giving advance notice? That is hegemonic double standards - and a blatant affront to international fairness and justice," said Zhang Junshe. 
。

B |     A股第二大规模宽基指数，A500ETF或将掀起一轮新鏖战。                   市场传言称，“上交所和深交所预计各选1只中证A500ETF纳入期权标的”。消息一出，立马引发热议。                   一方面，首批中证A500ETF上市已经超过一年，纳入期权标的也在预期之内；另一方面，当前已上市A500相关ETF超40只，上交所、深交所各占半壁江山，如按传言，单交易所仅有1只纳入，谁能入选？                    有基金公司方面表示，对于纳入期权标的暂无确切消息，但是A500规模之争早已暗潮涌动。                   最新规模来看，40只中证A500ETF以及增强ETF最新规模为1928.24亿元。                   其中，200亿以上规模A500ETF已有3只，上交所上市的华泰柏瑞A500ETF自今年内6月底稳居行业第一，最新规模为238.96亿元，国泰中证A500ETF和易方达A500ETF紧随其后，两只ETF均在深交所上市。                   又“卷”起来了，A500ETF成交额霸屏                    A500ETF持营战再次打响。10月20日，市场冲高回落，缩量上涨，热点轮动没有明显的主线，资金活跃度上，A500ETF一只独秀。

C | 截至收盘，全市场股票ETF成交额前十中，A500ETF占据了5个席位。                   具体来看，华夏A500ETF成交额为50.81亿元，领跑股票ETF成交榜，国泰A500ETF和华泰柏瑞A500ETF成交额均超40亿元，南方A500ETF、易方达A500ETF成交额同样排名靠前。40余只中证A500ETF合计成交额超274亿元，上述成交额前五的A500ETF合计成交213亿元，占比近8成。                   场内成交额代表了流动性，尽管成交额高不一定意味着资金流入规模多，资金流入更多体现在份额申购而非二级市场买卖。但是对于非行业主题ETF，且规模不占优势的品种上，多只产品同时成交额放大，背后原因或是做市商交易活跃，是基金公司持营的方式之一。                             宽基ETF是持久战，这是入场基金公司的共识。

D |                    作为全市场第二大宽基指数，A500ETF的持营战依然是在前半程。从规模来看，场内A500相关ETF规模为1928亿元，整体较最高峰2700亿元缩水明显，产品规模差距拉大，已有12只ETF规模不足2亿元。                   但是对于头部ETF基金公司而言，A500依然是必争之地，尤其是季末阶段，A500冲量明显。从最新规模来看，华泰柏瑞A500ETF自今年6月底跃升至行业第一后，始终保持领先优势；具备先发优势的国泰A500ETF紧随其后；期间包括南方A500ETF、广发A500ETF一度冲至前三，近期易方达A500ETF势头更猛。                             谁能纳入期权标的？17只产品入围                    基金公司再次在A500ETF上发力或与当下“两交易所各选1只中证A500ETF纳入期权标的”市场传言相关。随着A500ETF产品不断扩容，成为A股举足轻重的宽基ETF，纳入期权标的也是顺理成章，水到渠成。                   纳入期权标的对于ETF而言，相当于按下了规模“加速器”。一般而言，从对冲组合或波动率交易策略角度而言，机构投资者更倾向于选择纳入期权标的ETF进行交易，进而推动该ETF规模增长。有统计显示，以创业板ETF、中证500ETF为例，纳入期权标的后，对应ETF份额短期内增长40%、60%，规模拉动效应显著。                   那么，ETF纳入期权标的需要什么条件？根据深交所发布《深圳证券交易所股票期权试点交易规则》显示，ETF被选择作为合约标的时，应当符合下列四个条件：                    （一）属于本所公布的融资融券标的证券；                    （二）基金成立时间不少于6个月；                    （三）最近6个月的日均持有账户数不低于4000户；                    （四）本所规定的其他条件。                   财联社记者统计显示，当前符合上述条件的A500ETF产品有17只，几乎涵盖了首批A500ETF，这也再次凸显了权益ETF先发优势。                   从上交所上市的A500ETF而言，华泰柏瑞A500ETF胜算最大，最新规模为238.96亿元，2025年半年报显示，持有人户数为2.59万户，年内净流入为31.87亿元，年内资金流入排第一；上交所上市规模排在第二的是华夏基金，当前规模为160.59亿元，持有人户数为3.18万户，同样具备一定的竞争力。

E |                    深交所上市的A500角逐更为激烈，该交易所规模第一的是国泰A500ETF，规模为218.83亿元，持有人户数遥遥领先全市场，为10.6万户；与此同时，易方达A500ETF规模上紧随其后，当前规模211.73亿元，持有人户数为2.07万户，年内资金净流入，呈现明显的追赶之势；南方A500ETF也有突围可能，当前规模为195.73亿元，持有户数2.13万户。                   从规模、户数上，上述产品优势更为明显，但是从交易所规则来看，鹏华、嘉实、富国、天弘、博时、泰康、汇添富、摩根、银华、招商、广发、景顺长城等旗下A500ETF均符合要求。可以预见的是，在纳入期权标的未落地之前，规模排序、流动性表现等指标均是加分项，头部产品的鏖战或许也更加激烈。

Current article:http://4drr0.senbatuqiuzhuanlanrilao.sbs/news/20260826_60369.html

Published on:19:37:21